You have likely seen the clean 16 with a 20HP Honda. Bit weak for ocean use I think. How would dual 20's do a a 16? Seller has used the boat on a lake only.
Bob
On a previous thread within the past year, we discussed twins on a 16, and the group consensus was that it was unnecessarily complicated, heavy, expensive to maintain, and offered no real advantages, as I remember.
A single 40 or 50 is the accepted norm and best overall solution, IMHO. Get a small kicker for trolling, if desired.
I agree I would not start with a 20hp or twins either but this boat has a 20hp and they are not going to keep the motor and sell the boat for less. Just checking. Actually, the 16 could use an Armstrong bracket with a bit of extra flotation to help the balance issue but then it would just be a type of a 19' more or less. Thanks for the replies.
Bob
Bob, have you done the math and compared the weight of twin 20s vs. a single 40? Or a 40 + a kicker? IMO if the boat is right converting to twins, while an important consideration, isn't necessarily be a deal breaker. Remember, the throttle controls for twins may force the drivers seat to be relocated towards the centerline of the boat a bit.
Just repowered this past summer. Replaced a 50 with a 50. Did all the research and reasoning I could muster, but couldn't make it to twins on my 16 Cruiser. But, I still love the thought of the possibility.
I actually explored the Armstrong Bracket (positive flotation). I had one on one of my center console boats. But the overall cost would have made more sense to sell and move up to a 19 or 22 where twins would be more practical.
If the 16 Cruiser would have been rated for a 60, I would have repowered with twin 30's. And no one would have been able to talk me out of it! But no way would I have repowered with twin 20's. I would have lost in total power, and total weight at the transom would have gone up. Trust me, I am all about wanting twins on my 16. But it just doesn't work out in practicality.