We put a 9.9 HP, electric-start Tohatsu on our Marinaut, and love the engine. It has been trouble-free thus far. We had our Tohatsu mounted on a Garelick Offshore bracket. Here are our findings.
1) We use the motor only for emergencies, albeit we test it monthly, then let it run dry of fuel. The gas we use contains ethanol, so we use Blue Stabil at storage levels (twice the normal amount) to ensure we keep our fuel healthy.
2) On one level, we don't really like the Garelick bracket anymore. It suffers from the same issues as the Garelick bracket we installed on our CD 16 -- after a year or so, it sticks such that it is a devil of a time to push it down to lower it. I have to perch myself on top of the transom and step on it with all 250 pounds to get it down. On the other hand, we found we don't need to lower the motor. Since our kicker has a long shaft, we like it in the upper position because it will allow for shallow operation.
3) On the down side of not lowering the kicker, we found we could not go more then 1/2 throttle before the prop cavitates, as one would expect, because it is too close to the surface.
4) Speed tests. I think it pushes our boat at approximately 5 mph at 1/2 throttle. In tests against a 2.5 mph river current today, and heading directly into the wind, we were making 2.5 mph at 1/2 throttle. Downriver, we did approximately 8 mph. I was going to do a more formal test, but 9.9 HP is plenty of kicker for what we need -- an auxiliary function. If we lowered the motor bracket deeper, I estimate our top speed on a Marinaut with a kicker running WOT is around 5.5 mph. I would like to lower the motor bracket get the proper lower in the water to provide more empirical information, but it takes too much effort. It would be interesting to see what other people are experiencing.
5) Changing the motor tilt on a Marinaut is extremely difficult unless one climbs on top of the transom, and even then, it takes a lot of physical exertion. For those who intend to use a kicker regularly for fishing, power trim/tilt with a fixed bracket is a good option to choose, in my opinion.
Rich
1) We use the motor only for emergencies, albeit we test it monthly, then let it run dry of fuel. The gas we use contains ethanol, so we use Blue Stabil at storage levels (twice the normal amount) to ensure we keep our fuel healthy.
2) On one level, we don't really like the Garelick bracket anymore. It suffers from the same issues as the Garelick bracket we installed on our CD 16 -- after a year or so, it sticks such that it is a devil of a time to push it down to lower it. I have to perch myself on top of the transom and step on it with all 250 pounds to get it down. On the other hand, we found we don't need to lower the motor. Since our kicker has a long shaft, we like it in the upper position because it will allow for shallow operation.
3) On the down side of not lowering the kicker, we found we could not go more then 1/2 throttle before the prop cavitates, as one would expect, because it is too close to the surface.
4) Speed tests. I think it pushes our boat at approximately 5 mph at 1/2 throttle. In tests against a 2.5 mph river current today, and heading directly into the wind, we were making 2.5 mph at 1/2 throttle. Downriver, we did approximately 8 mph. I was going to do a more formal test, but 9.9 HP is plenty of kicker for what we need -- an auxiliary function. If we lowered the motor bracket deeper, I estimate our top speed on a Marinaut with a kicker running WOT is around 5.5 mph. I would like to lower the motor bracket get the proper lower in the water to provide more empirical information, but it takes too much effort. It would be interesting to see what other people are experiencing.
5) Changing the motor tilt on a Marinaut is extremely difficult unless one climbs on top of the transom, and even then, it takes a lot of physical exertion. For those who intend to use a kicker regularly for fishing, power trim/tilt with a fixed bracket is a good option to choose, in my opinion.
Rich