I really don't want to get hate mail from Thataway, a very long term poster that he is, but I have to very politely disagree with his "Wet transoms are relatively infrequent in C Dorys of that vintage." This is my 1st posting here, but I've been lurking ever since I decided that I wanted to buy a C dory 22 cruiser.
My search for my C-Dory had me all over the eastern US in May and June of '25 and I had a chance to look at 4 boats ranging from 1999-2006, before buying the last boat that I looked at which was the 1999. My requirements were simple, I was looking for a hull that was free of any moisture, predominantly near the stern of the boat where the older boats had the fuel tanks secured using brackets that were screwed through glass and into the 1" balsa hull core or the newer boats had panels to hide the fuel tanks screwed into the same area of the deck and into the core. The transoms were a given, I figured I would find varying degrees of wetness on all of the boats (very common on any model outboard boat over 20 years old) that I looked at so that work was a given. The transoms on these boats are small and it won't take me over a week from start to spraying paint to fix (yes I've been doing this for most of my life both professionally as well as for myself.) so I wasn't focused on them.
I did check all of the transoms though and yes, all including mine were wet in areas and had varying degrees de-lamination. What my boat had, I don't know why, was a totally dry hull core, hence I bought the boat even though the boat, overall, required way more work to put her into like new condition than did the newer models. (thin gel coat, 6 circuits switch panel made up of drill spun twisted un-tinned 16g wire pairs with not a fuse or breaker to be found anywhere. Mild steel angle bracket holding the furniture in place and best of all, the doorway bilge pump's box made out of plywood... all easy fixes).
Now, having said that, I want to reassure people that only 1 of the boats had enough moisture in the hull to really concern me and and that boat was in CT. Not only that, but it had been recently surveyed for a woman that walked because she wasn't sure that she wanted to deal with the wet transom. The owner gave me the surveyors # and when I called the surveyor, he was quite personable and more than willing to talk about the boat. He told me that yeah the transom was wet but it didn't worry him as it wasn't as wet as some that he had seen. When I asked him about the hull he said that it was solid and the boat was a great little boat and I should buy it! I then told him that I had just surveyed the boat and the balsa core at the rear of the boat had very high levels of moisture he mumbled something like Oh, I thought that it was solid fiberglass...
Please, this is not a huge deal and it comes with the territory for a very light, stiff, fuel efficient cored hull. And in all cases the wet areas were very contained and very easy to access. It would not have been hard to replace the 2- smaller than ~1'-2'x3' wet/damp core areas and have a perfect hull again. There's nothing in your way to cut out the inner skin, R&R the core etc, but I didn't want to get into that at this point in my life.
Enjoy, Frank
1999 C-Dory
No name yet
Great design and I LOVE the boat!