I've recently finished installing an electric trolling motor on the main motor of my CD-22 Cruiser as an alternative to a gas powered kicker trolling motor, although it would be possible to have the gas kicker as well. Here is the link to the photos in my album:
(Be sure to read the comments under the photos for explanations.)
http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_ ... _photo.php
I did this partially because I was tired of dealing with the second gas motor and its controls, complications, and limitations. I also wanted a motor that would allow me to troll below 1.75 mph and do so very quietly. I did not want to add a trolling plate to the main motor, nor drag a drogue chute, buckets, or whatever. I did not need a big thrust kicker with which to come home off a big water fishing trip, although one could have all three on the same boat.
I choose an engine mounted trolling motor mostly because the steering problem is solved by mounting it directly on the main engine above and behind the motor's anti-ventilation plate. No need for any other link rod, handle extension, or steering wheel. Shifting and throttle control are easily done from the regular helm with a small electric control box.
In addition, the motor can troll with its 44 lbs of thrust ultra quietly from 0 to a little over 2 mph, overlapping slightly the main motor's 1.5-1.75 minimum trolling speed. Both are controlled simply from the helm, and the transition from one to the other is as effortless and seamless as possible.
The very quiet nature of the electric motor also is very stealth like, helping minimize the presence of the CD-22, which otherwise has somewhat a startling and scattering effect on spooky species of fish such as trout and walleye when trolling nearer the surface. While no one worries much about the boat's effect when trolling with downriggers at 50 or more feet, working closer to the surface with a boat the size of a 22 implores one to use long lines, outriggers, side planners, and the like to minimize the effect of the presence of the boat. While an electric trolling motor won't make your CD look like a canoe to the fish, it will make it just about as quiet.
I added two extra group 27 deep cycle marine batteries under the forward dinette seat to increase the capacity of my boat to 440 Amp-Hours from half that. You really don't have to do this, the motor will work fine on one of the existing group 27's for three hours without charging, but I liked the idea of having lots of reserve power so I could wait to re-charge batteries at the marina with shore power and the built-in charger in the boat, rather than relying on the 25 amp output of the 2005 Yamaha EFI 90. While the motor draws a max of 36 amps for 44 lbs of thrust, it typically uses 15-25 amps when trolling, so every hour of trolling would take 35-60 minutes of motor operation above 1500 or so rpm to recharge. We actually run the bigger motor quite a bit to reposition the boat before trolling downwind and to get to different areas, so the loss is pretty quickly made up and we don't go into too deep into the battery reserves. I do, however, like the security margin the extra batteries provide. No need to worry about fan motors for the heater or anchor lights at night, either. The extra 120 lbs also helps balance my weight at the helm, and pushes the bow down into the chop when on plane. With two battery switches in parallel, any single or combination of the 4 batteries can be used or charged as desired.
In my case, I was also able to get rid of the 77 lb 15 hp Johnson kicker and 45 lbs of th separate gas storage tank at the same time from the starboard side of the boat, which also helped redistribute weight.
The only flaw in the system I didn't anticipate was that the reverse thrust of the trolling motor is rendered partially ineffective because the water from the reverse thrust strikes the transom, and the force created partially cancels out the bite of the prop. But it still works ok, and we generally start the big motor up when we get hung-up to back up more quickly and free the snag.
For those who might be concerned with hydrogen and oxygen being released during the charing process, most new batteries are sealed, don't require water to be added, and don't release these potentially explosive combination of gases into the air.
In the event of a loss of the big motor, I should be able to run quite a ways electrically to get home on an inland lake:
440 a-h x 65% = 286 ah, and 286 a-h / 30 amps = 9.5 hrs, and
9.5 hrs @ 1.5 mph = 14 miles. The numbers can be re-approximated, but the results come in about the same. Ok for Shasta Lake, but I wouldn't want to come home from the Farallones on it. For that, we'll add the kicker back in the equation.
Let me know if you have questions. There's more to this than what I have discussed here. Joe.
(Be sure to read the comments under the photos for explanations.)
http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_ ... _photo.php
I did this partially because I was tired of dealing with the second gas motor and its controls, complications, and limitations. I also wanted a motor that would allow me to troll below 1.75 mph and do so very quietly. I did not want to add a trolling plate to the main motor, nor drag a drogue chute, buckets, or whatever. I did not need a big thrust kicker with which to come home off a big water fishing trip, although one could have all three on the same boat.
I choose an engine mounted trolling motor mostly because the steering problem is solved by mounting it directly on the main engine above and behind the motor's anti-ventilation plate. No need for any other link rod, handle extension, or steering wheel. Shifting and throttle control are easily done from the regular helm with a small electric control box.
In addition, the motor can troll with its 44 lbs of thrust ultra quietly from 0 to a little over 2 mph, overlapping slightly the main motor's 1.5-1.75 minimum trolling speed. Both are controlled simply from the helm, and the transition from one to the other is as effortless and seamless as possible.
The very quiet nature of the electric motor also is very stealth like, helping minimize the presence of the CD-22, which otherwise has somewhat a startling and scattering effect on spooky species of fish such as trout and walleye when trolling nearer the surface. While no one worries much about the boat's effect when trolling with downriggers at 50 or more feet, working closer to the surface with a boat the size of a 22 implores one to use long lines, outriggers, side planners, and the like to minimize the effect of the presence of the boat. While an electric trolling motor won't make your CD look like a canoe to the fish, it will make it just about as quiet.
I added two extra group 27 deep cycle marine batteries under the forward dinette seat to increase the capacity of my boat to 440 Amp-Hours from half that. You really don't have to do this, the motor will work fine on one of the existing group 27's for three hours without charging, but I liked the idea of having lots of reserve power so I could wait to re-charge batteries at the marina with shore power and the built-in charger in the boat, rather than relying on the 25 amp output of the 2005 Yamaha EFI 90. While the motor draws a max of 36 amps for 44 lbs of thrust, it typically uses 15-25 amps when trolling, so every hour of trolling would take 35-60 minutes of motor operation above 1500 or so rpm to recharge. We actually run the bigger motor quite a bit to reposition the boat before trolling downwind and to get to different areas, so the loss is pretty quickly made up and we don't go into too deep into the battery reserves. I do, however, like the security margin the extra batteries provide. No need to worry about fan motors for the heater or anchor lights at night, either. The extra 120 lbs also helps balance my weight at the helm, and pushes the bow down into the chop when on plane. With two battery switches in parallel, any single or combination of the 4 batteries can be used or charged as desired.
In my case, I was also able to get rid of the 77 lb 15 hp Johnson kicker and 45 lbs of th separate gas storage tank at the same time from the starboard side of the boat, which also helped redistribute weight.
The only flaw in the system I didn't anticipate was that the reverse thrust of the trolling motor is rendered partially ineffective because the water from the reverse thrust strikes the transom, and the force created partially cancels out the bite of the prop. But it still works ok, and we generally start the big motor up when we get hung-up to back up more quickly and free the snag.
For those who might be concerned with hydrogen and oxygen being released during the charing process, most new batteries are sealed, don't require water to be added, and don't release these potentially explosive combination of gases into the air.
In the event of a loss of the big motor, I should be able to run quite a ways electrically to get home on an inland lake:
440 a-h x 65% = 286 ah, and 286 a-h / 30 amps = 9.5 hrs, and
9.5 hrs @ 1.5 mph = 14 miles. The numbers can be re-approximated, but the results come in about the same. Ok for Shasta Lake, but I wouldn't want to come home from the Farallones on it. For that, we'll add the kicker back in the equation.
Let me know if you have questions. There's more to this than what I have discussed here. Joe.