I've been doing some research on fuel flow meters. The general consensus seems to run in favor of the Floscan line, with Navman a close second.
Apparently newer Yamaha 4-stroke engines use a two-fuel pump system that often results in erroneous fuel consumption readings.
I contacted Floscan for a recommendation and received the following reply:
Has anyone had experience with this issue? Presumably the Navman system has the same issue, is that correct?
jd
Apparently newer Yamaha 4-stroke engines use a two-fuel pump system that often results in erroneous fuel consumption readings.
I contacted Floscan for a recommendation and received the following reply:
Unfortunately, we cannot give a firm recommendation for this engine application. The Yamaha 4-stroke fuel system is a "two-pump" fuel system, having a low-pressure lift pump and a high-pressure injection pump. The low-pressure lift pump delivers fuel to a vapor separator tank/module, which is continually filling/draining/re-filling as a float switch turns on and off. This causes a cycling effect that can interrupt our fuel-flow readings, possibly causing fluctuating and inaccurate fuel-flow readings to display on the FloScan instrument.
The strangest aspect of this scenario is that some customers say their FloScan equipment work fine with this type of application, some say they do not work properly regardless of RPM or boating conditions, and some say that the FloScan equipment does not work properly at low RPM but does work properly at cruising and high RPM. Because of this vast discrepancy, and not foreseeing a resolution, we stopped providing recommendations for Yamaha 4-strokes. However, those customers who have and use FloScan kits with Yamaha 4-strokes typically use FloScan kits containing model #20B flow sensors
Has anyone had experience with this issue? Presumably the Navman system has the same issue, is that correct?
jd