Happy DNA Day

El and Bill

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2003
Messages
3,200
Reaction score
0
C Dory Year
2000
C Dory Model
22 Cruiser
Hull Identification Number
Sold in 2012
Vessel Name
Halcyon
Rogerbum (especially) since he cruises on SEA-DNA, and to all the brats in the pub, HAPPY DNA DAY.

This holiday is celebrated on April 25. DNA Day recognizes the discovery of the DNA double helix and the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003.

If it wasn't for that discovery, Rogerbum would probably be only a fisherman off Neah Bay. How sad, eh Roger? :sad

OK -- How do we celebrate the big day, Roger?
 
El and Bill,

Quoting Sherlock Holmes, "Watson this DNA stuff gives me a Crick!!

OK, so a pun is a low form of humor....

Steve
 
Well, my sense is, the discovery is what allowed Roger to be a fisherman off Neah Bay! And since I caught about 3/4 of all the fish I have ever caught on SeaDNA at Neah Bay, I say, here's to DNA Day!


El and Bill":2laigy18 said:
If it wasn't for that discovery, Rogerbum would probably be only a fisherman off Neah Bay. How sad, eh Roger? :sad
 
El and Bill":33cyi7od said:
Rogerbum (especially) since he cruises on SEA-DNA, and to all the brats in the pub, HAPPY DNA DAY.

This holiday is celebrated on April 25. DNA Day recognizes the discovery of the DNA double helix and the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003.

If it wasn't for that discovery, Rogerbum would probably be only a fisherman off Neah Bay. How sad, eh Roger? :sad

That doesn't sound all bad to me - except for years like this one when the quota will be very low.

El and Bill":33cyi7od said:
OK -- How do we celebrate the big day, Roger?

Hmmmm.....

Well
1) There's a great winery in the NW - Reininger - that makes a wine called Helix. You could drink two glasses (a "double Helix"). OR
2) You could just stay home and evolve.

That's all I got... :wink:
 
Roger -
We like your evolved double helix up at the winery. Speaking of DNA, has anyone else done a 'deep' DNA on themselves? Nat'l Geographic has what they call their Genographic Project tracking human migrations to the present. Their tracking of the past migration routes of Australian aborigines and some of the tribal groups in Central Asia has been fascinating. We did our DNA -- and discovered that perhaps our love of water and boating (and travel) is genetic since our ancestors were wandering all around the Med (probably sailors, presumably scattering DNA in every port) most of the time since leaving Africa on a weekend stroll on September 17th, 40,000 years plus or minus ten minutes ago. Anyway, it's a way to contribute to their Genographic Project and learn your ancestor's route to your C-Dory!
 
While we're a little on the topic of DNA testing, one thing I thought I'd mention is that in the past year or so a number of companies have begun to offer a variety of "personalized" DNA or genomics tests. In many cases, these companies test for a wide variety of genetic variations than have been "associated" with disease. The key word here is "associated". In general, most of these tests are not in any way conclusive nor do we have any solid recommendations on what to do as a result of having been found to have a given genetic variation. In a lot of cases, the presence of a certain DNA sequence has no impact in a given individual even though on average across a lot of individuals it results in an increased risk of disease. Hence, at present, the bottom line is that many of the tests currently being offered by these up and coming companies, do not provide much benefit (other than to the shareholders of these companies). So, I'm just bringing this up to suggest that it's premature for people to make use of the current crop of large-scale genetic tests and rather it's best to only pay for tests that your physician has a good medical reason to order (e.g family history, other symptoms etc.).

The reason I bring this up is that the sister of a close friend dropped about $700 on some very dubious genetic tests last year. I looked at the tests she was given, the results of the tests and the "recommendations" given to her by the test providers. The bottom line is that she wasted $700 on tests that were roughly the equivalent of a horoscope. However, since the tests were wrapped up complex language and "sexy" DNA related technologies, it was easy for both the doctor and the testing company to confuse the patient. I just want to warn C-brats against falling into the same trap. If the test isn't FDA approved, get a 2nd or even 3rd opinion before dropping significant $'s.
 
Thanks for the good advice, Roger -- one more example of how the knowledge of C-Brats, shared in the pub, can be so beneficial to us all.
 
Back
Top