Colby,
As I've mentioned before, I don't feel the haphazard/inconsistent application of expanding foam was any kind of structural move on the part of the builder. If it was, they they didn't do a very good job of it, because the installation is all over the map (from boat to boat).
I don't know if the newer boats have a heavier layup, but I have not heard of them weighing more, and also, there are better/lighter ways to strengthen.
If I were going to stiffen the bow of a boat (say to prevent oilcanning, etc.), I think I would so something like glass in stringers running fore and aft at around two foot intervals. Basically these would be hollow hat shapes of fiberglass - they could be molded around "halfs" of PVC pipe, shaped foam, whatever. It's the "outline" that would give it the strength, and the inside is just a form. They would make the boat much stronger, shape-wise.
If I were building the boat and wanted to make the bow more "icebreakerish? I'm no marine architect, but I would think extending the core, with thick skins, would make it both quieter and stronger. I just don't see that happening with some expanding foam shot into some holes. On the other hand, it doesn't seem like the C-Dory needs it for the typical use.
I don't know if the newer boats have a heavier layup, but I have not heard of them weighing more, and also, there are better ways to strengthen.
I'm thinking that if you are going to have a niggling doubt, then maybe you will want to keep the foam, but.... just know that production boatbuilders often do things "just because," and the reason is oftentimes not because it makes a superior vessel. (That's not to say our boats are not fantastic, but just a fact of life in production boatbuilding. Sometimes things get done because they are expedient, because that's how they were done in the past, or because a better solution would cost heavily in time/skill.)
My non-naval-architect thoughts,
Sunbeam